Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192749›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2026

Mechanisms of Visuomotor Interception.

Inmaculada Márquez, Mario Treviño

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive interception across speed profiles.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inmaculada MárquezLaboratorio de Plasticidad Cortical y Aprendizaje Perceptual, Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Francisco de Quevedo 180, Arcos Vallarta, Guadalajara 44130, Jalisco, Mexico.
Mario TreviñoLaboratorio de Plasticidad Cortical y Aprendizaje Perceptual, Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Francisco de Quevedo 180, Arcos Vallarta, Guadalajara 44130, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2476-5214

Funding

Ministry of Sciences, Humanities, Technology and Innovation CF-2023-G-107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesVisuomotor interception requires aligning action with the future state of moving targets under sensory and motor delays. This constraint provides a tractable framework to examine how predictive and feedback-driven processes interact. This narrative review evaluates theoretical and empirical accounts of interception, with emphasis on how prediction and online control are integrated across behavioral and neural levels.

methodsWe conducted a narrative synthesis of behavioral, eye-tracking, computational, and neurophysiological studies on visuomotor interception. Literature was identified through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using search terms including "visuomotor interception," "predictive motor control," "eye-hand coordination," "time-to-contact," "sensorimotor delay," and related combinations. Studies published between 1986 and 2026 were considered, with emphasis on peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical work. Preprints were included only when directly relevant and are identified as such. The review compares internal model, ecological, and hybrid frameworks, and organizes evidence around spatial ("where") and temporal ("when") components of control.

resultsAcross paradigms, interception behavior is not well accounted for by purely predictive or reactive mechanisms. Instead, trajectories reflect a continuous interaction between anticipatory guidance and online correction. Spatial and temporal components show partial dissociation across tasks and manipulations. Available evidence supports the involvement of distributed circuits, including parietal, frontal, cerebellar, and subcortical systems, while indicating that eye movements play an active role in both information sampling and motor planning.

conclusionsInterception is best understood as the product of interacting biological, environmental, and learned constraints. Similar behavioral signatures can arise from distinct mechanisms, arguing against a unitary account. Progress requires integrating behavioral analyses with model-based and neural approaches to dissociate underlying computations.

Indexed as

eye movementsinternal modelspredictive processingreinforcement learningsensorimotor controlvisuomotor interception

Identifiers

PMID42192749
PMCPMC13205071

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.