ReviewCancers2026
Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: State of the Art, Physical Principles, Potentials, and Challenges.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focal therapy in localized prostate cancer: moving from therapeutic enthusiasm to structured stewardship.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) suffers from the dilemma between the overtreatment associated with radical surgery and the uncertainty of active surveillance, highlighting a significant therapeutic gap specifically for intermediate-risk patients and selected low-risk patients. Focal therapy (FT) emerges as an advanced technological solution to balance rigorous oncological control with anatomical and functional preservation.
methodsA narrative review of the literature was conducted to analyze the physical principles underlying various ablative energies (thermal, cryogenic, and non-thermal) as well as radiation-based focal approaches. The review examines the oncological rationale of targeted ablation, recent innovations in imaging, and the expanding clinical scenarios for FT application.
resultsEvidence supports the oncological rationale of "Index Lesion" ablation as a targeted curative strategy for clinically significant disease, rather than merely a palliative one. The review highlights the emerging concept of "pushing the disease" and demonstrates the valuable role of salvage focal therapy in the setting of radio-recurrent carcinoma. Furthermore, recent innovations in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and fusion systems have significantly refined patient selection, rendering this minimally invasive approach highly targeted.
conclusionsThe current barrier to the universal adoption of focal therapy is the lack of a standardized consensus on the definitions of therapeutic failure and the inadequacy of traditional PSA-based criteria. However, evidence suggests that FT represents a promising, organ-sparing alternative for carefully selected patients with localized PCa, though long-term comparative data are still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.