ReviewCancers2026
Circulating Tumor Cells in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) comprise a rare and highly heterogeneous group of mesenchymal-derived malignancies, accounting for less than 1% of all cancers and characterized by diverse histologic and molecular subtypes. Despite their low incidence, STS account for a disproportionate burden of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, largely driven by their risk of metastatic dissemination. Early detection of metastatic spread is a cornerstone of preoperative staging, treatment planning, and postoperative monitoring in patients with STS. Although conventional imaging modalities remain fundamental for surveillance of metastatic disease, they may fail to accurately detect metastatic sites and provide limited insight into tumor biology. Advances in precision medicine have positioned liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive approach for the analysis of tumor-derived material, facilitating characterization of tumor biology and identification of prognostic biomarkers. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent intact and viable tumor cells that provide unique genomic and phenotypic traits that could not be assessed using acellular tumor-derived material. They have emerged as promising biomarkers for monitoring disease progression, assessing treatment response, and stratifying prognosis. Particularly, their clinical value as prognostic biomarkers has been established in epithelial-derived malignancies. Despite these advances, the role of CTCs in STS remains largely investigational, mainly due to STS heterogeneity and the lack of standardized protocols for detection across platforms. Therefore, this narrative review summarizes the biomolecular mechanisms underlying CTCs in STS, including the role of phenotypic plasticity in tumor intravasation, anoikis resistance and its interaction with the tumor microenvironment, and stem cell-like phenotypes in tumor initiation at distant sites. Furthermore, we discuss current methodologies for CTC detection, highlighting emerging approaches developed to address the limitations of conventional methods. Finally, we provide a critical overview of subtype-specific detection strategies, as well as their clinical implications in treatment response monitoring and prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.