Evidence mapPaperPMID 42193136Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026

AI and Machine Learning for Proteomics-Driven Drug Discovery: Methods, Tools, and Best Practices.

Suman Basak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Suman BasakDepartment of Health Technology (DTU Health Technology), Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-9117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics has become central to pharmacological research by providing quantitative readouts of protein abundance, post-translational modifications, interactions, and spatial context. However, proteomic datasets are high-dimensional, heterogeneous, and frequently affected by missingness, batch effects, and limited cohort size. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can help convert these complex data into decision-relevant outputs for target identification, biomarker discovery, pharmacodynamic monitoring, and drug repurposing. This review critically compares supervised learning, ensemble methods, dimensionality reduction, clustering, deep learning, graph learning, survival modeling, causal inference, and calibration approaches in proteomics-driven drug discovery. We also summarize major software ecosystems for mass-spectrometry processing, targeted assays, spectrum prediction, phosphoproteomics, structure modeling, and reproducible workflows. Emphasis is placed on model selection, benchmarking, missing-data handling, batch correction, interpretability, uncertainty, experimental validation, and translational readiness. Finally, we highlight emerging directions, including contrastive learning, diffusion models, graph-based integration, and federated analytics.

Indexed as

batch effectsbiomarker discoverydeep learningDIAdrug discoverygraph neural networksmachine learningmass spectrometrymissing dataproteomics

Identifiers

PMID42193136
PMCPMC13204856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.