ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026
AI and Machine Learning for Proteomics-Driven Drug Discovery: Methods, Tools, and Best Practices.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle Boron Carrier for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Research Progress and Perspectives in China.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Copper Integrated PDA-TA Nanocoating via One-Step Rapid Polymerization on Titanium for Anti-Thrombotic and Antibacterial Properties.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- A CNN-MAMBA-Based Framework for Salient Bowel Sound Detection and Gastrointestinal Health Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteomics has become central to pharmacological research by providing quantitative readouts of protein abundance, post-translational modifications, interactions, and spatial context. However, proteomic datasets are high-dimensional, heterogeneous, and frequently affected by missingness, batch effects, and limited cohort size. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can help convert these complex data into decision-relevant outputs for target identification, biomarker discovery, pharmacodynamic monitoring, and drug repurposing. This review critically compares supervised learning, ensemble methods, dimensionality reduction, clustering, deep learning, graph learning, survival modeling, causal inference, and calibration approaches in proteomics-driven drug discovery. We also summarize major software ecosystems for mass-spectrometry processing, targeted assays, spectrum prediction, phosphoproteomics, structure modeling, and reproducible workflows. Emphasis is placed on model selection, benchmarking, missing-data handling, batch correction, interpretability, uncertainty, experimental validation, and translational readiness. Finally, we highlight emerging directions, including contrastive learning, diffusion models, graph-based integration, and federated analytics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.