ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Associations of Dietary Antioxidant and Phytochemical Indices with Cognitive Function: Mediating Roles of Basal Metabolic Rate and Systemic Inflammation.
Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dietary phytochemical index and biomarker profiles are associated with colorectal cancer odds: integrating dietary intake with blood biomarkers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dietary antioxidants and phytochemicals are believed to support cognitive health, but evidence on composite dietary indices remains limited. This cross-sectional study of 1845 community-dwelling older adults in China investigated the associations of the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) and dietary phytochemical index (DPI) with cognitive function and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Beijing version). MCI was diagnosed through a two-stage procedure: MoCA-based preliminary screening (with education-stratified cutoffs: 13/14 for illiterate, 19/20 for 1-6 years, 24/25 for ≥7 years) followed by neurologist confirmation. CDAI was calculated as the sum of the standardized intakes of six antioxidants (selenium, zinc, carotenoids, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E); DPI was defined as the percentage of the total energy intake from phytochemical-rich foods (fruits, vegetables excluding potatoes, legumes including soy products, nuts, seeds, and whole grains). Multivariable linear regression, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. The basal metabolic rate (BMR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII; platelets × neutrophils/lymphocytes) were tested as potential statistical mediators. Each one-unit increase in CDAI was associated with a 0.068-point higher MoCA score (95% CI: 0.012-0.123), and each one-unit increase in DPI was associated with a 0.029-point higher MoCA score (95% CI: 0.008-0.050). BMR and SII partially mediated the association between CDAI and MoCA score, but temporal ordering remains unclear due to the cross-sectional design. When both CDAI and DPI were in the highest quartile, participants had a 46.3% lower risk of MCI compared with those with both indices in the lowest quartile (OR = 0.537, 95% CI: 0.308-0.935). A predictive model incorporating CDAI, inflammatory markers, and red blood cell parameters showed moderate discriminatory ability in this study sample (apparent AUC = 0.731, bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.728). These findings suggest that a higher combined dietary antioxidant and phytochemical intake may be jointly associated with better cognitive function, although the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.