ReviewBiomedicines2026
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation from Sinus-Rhythm Electrocardiograms and Ambulatory Monitoring.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NovelBiomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent arrhythmia associated with stroke, heart failure and excess mortality. Yet, "silent" AF episodes remain undetected, leading to underestimation of disease burden. Additionally, paroxysms occur in an "unpredictable" way, and available clinical scores only stratify long-term AF risk with moderate discrimination, lacking the ability to evaluate near-term events. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to sinus rhythm from short or continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings shows that such predictive information is hidden in "plain sight." This complementary approach seeks to uncover latent AF substrate and forecast imminent AF episodes. Deep-learning models trained on 10-s, 12-lead ECGs can identify individuals with prevalent or long- or near-term AF with areas under the curve (AUCs) up to 0.90, outperforming established clinical scores. Image-based AI-ECG models extend these capabilities to paper or scanned ECGs. Furthermore, AI algorithms applied to 24-h Holter and multi-day patch recordings achieve AUCs ≥0.80 for detecting occult AF or predicting it within 14 days, consistently surpassing risk scores like C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.