ReviewCells2026
Gene Editing Strategies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prime Editing Mediated Generation and Correction of the mdx5cv Mutation Restores Dystrophin Expression in Myoblasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) remains a major challenge in genetic medicine due to the difficulty of achieving durable, body-wide restoration of dystrophin in post-mitotic muscle tissues. Although current therapies-including exon skipping and micro-dystrophin gene replacement-have demonstrated clinical feasibility, their benefits are limited by incomplete efficacy, mutation specificity, and the need for repeated or high-dose interventions. These limitations highlight the need for strategies capable of directly and permanently correcting the underlying genetic defect. Recent advances in genome editing have positioned CRISPR-based technologies as promising candidates for this objective. Rather than functioning as a single approach, gene-editing platforms encompass a spectrum of strategies-including exon deletion, exon reframing, base editing, and prime editing-each with distinct advantages depending on the mutational context. In particular, the emergence of precision editing tools has enabled controlled nucleotide-level modifications, expanding the range of correctable mutations while reducing reliance on double-strand DNA breaks. In this review, we adopt a comparative and translational perspective to evaluate gene-editing strategies for DMD. We examine how different approaches align with specific mutation types, summarize key findings from preclinical studies, and analyze the major barriers to clinical implementation, including delivery efficiency, immune responses, editing durability, and genomic safety. We further discuss emerging innovations in editing technologies and delivery systems that aim to address these limitations. Collectively, this work reframes gene editing as a decision-oriented and application-driven therapeutic framework. Continued integration of advances in genome engineering, delivery platforms, and muscle biology will be essential to translate these technologies into safe, effective, and durable treatments capable of altering the clinical trajectory of DMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.