Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42194296›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Toward Intelligent Rehabilitation Program Management: A System-Level Review of AI Architectures.

Catalina Luca, Ilie Onu, Sardaru Dragos, Daniela Viorelia Matei, Robert Fuior, Calin Petru Corciova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catalina LucaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-8582
Ilie OnuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1003-0719
Sardaru DragosDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Daniela Viorelia MateiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Robert FuiorDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Calin Petru CorciovaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0641-8323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping medical rehabilitation by advancing from isolated assistive technologies toward data-driven program management. Beyond established applications in robotics and virtual reality, AI enables multimodal data integration, predictive analytics, adaptive therapy optimization, and real-time monitoring across rehabilitation domains. This review synthesizes 61 peer-reviewed studies to examine how AI supports the management, planning, and evaluation of rehabilitation programs. The evidence indicates strong technical maturity at the device and session levels, particularly in robotic control and wearable monitoring, whereas longitudinal program orchestration and system-level coordination remain at an emerging stage. Machine learning, reinforcement learning, computer vision, and time-series models facilitate patient phenotyping, therapy personalization, and prognostic modeling. However, their scalability is constrained by limited interoperability, heterogeneous outcome measures, and insufficient multicenter validation. A structured six-layer management architecture is proposed to conceptualize AI as an integrated orchestration framework. Advancing toward scalable and trustworthy rehabilitation ecosystems will require interoperable infrastructures, longitudinal validation, and embedded ethical and explainability mechanisms.

Indexed as

clinical decision support systemscomputer visiondigital healthpersonalized therapypredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID42194296
PMCPMC13203811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.