ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Current and Emerging Treatments for Isolated Aortic Stenosis and Concomitant Mitral Stenosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral stenosis (MS) are progressive valvular heart diseases associated with substantial morbidity and mortality once symptoms develop. Over the past decade, the management of isolated AS has undergone profound evolution, driven by refinements in surgical aortic valve replacement, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques, and the rapid expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement across all surgical risk categories. In contrast, patients with concomitant AS and MS represent a complex and understudied population, frequently excluded from randomized trials and only marginally addressed in contemporary clinical practice guidelines. The management requires individualized guideline-directed decision-making led by a multidisciplinary Heart Team. The paucity of high-quality data in combined AS-MS underscores the need for dedicated prospective studies and international registries. The aim of this narrative review is to describe current strategies to treat AS both when isolated and concomitant with MS. We also discuss the need for updated, specific guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.