ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Enhancing Work Efficiency and Safety Culture in the Food Industry Using Behavioral Patterns: A Video-Based Case Study from Poland.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the impact of professional experience on workflow performance and assess the potential of using behavioral patterns derived from video-based observation to improve work efficiency and safety culture in the food industry. The experiment was conducted at a meat processing plant, with 48 employees divided into four experience groups. Deviations from behavioral patterns, work cycle times, and an efficiency index that considered both speed and accuracy (calculated as a ratio combining task completion time and the average number of deviations) were analyzed. The results showed that experienced employees completed tasks the fastest (8.3 s/cycle) but made the most errors (an average of 4 deviations), while new inexperienced employees worked slower (15.6 s/cycle) but with fewer errors (an average of 1.5 deviations). New employees with previous experience achieved the highest process efficiency (EI = 0.031), demonstrating that a balance between speed and accuracy is crucial. The study is based exclusively on video observation, and no Motion Capture (MoCap) system was used. However, the potential future application of MoCap technology is discussed as a conceptual extension, particularly for enhancing training processes and enabling real-time feedback. Monitoring movements and providing real-time feedback can reduce errors, improve efficiency and support a culture of safety, in line with the principles of Industry 5.0 and sustainability in food production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.