ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advancements in Ultrasound Gel Pad Technologies: Enhancing Diagnostic Precision, Procedural Efficiency, and Therapeutic Applications.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound coupling technology is pivotal to ensuring high-quality diagnostic imaging, yet conventional water-based gels face persistent challenges, including acoustic impedance mismatch, air-bubble formation, dehydration, messiness, and cross-contamination risks. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of the evolution, materials science, and clinical performance of ultrasound gel pads, an advanced alternative engineered for superior acoustic transmission, hygiene, and patient comfort. Historical progression from early coupling agents to modern polymeric and hydrogel-based pads is traced, highlighting breakthroughs such as bilayer hydrogels, nanocomposite reinforcements, metamaterial-inspired designs, and patient-specific 3D-printed pads. Comparative evaluations demonstrate that gel pads, particularly those integrating nanotechnology, rival but often outperform traditional gels in transmission efficiency, near-field resolution, and adaptability to complex anatomical surfaces, while offering reusability and reduced environmental impact. For instance, solid gel pads achieved 92.3% stone disintegration, compared with 45.5% for semi-liquid gel, in ESWL phantom studies (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.