ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Feasibility of Ti-6Al-4V Alloys with Nanoporous and Nanotubular Surfaces for the Treatment of Femoral Defects.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treating fractures involving complex bone defects remains a major challenge in regenerative medicine. Additive manufacturing enables the fabrication of patient-specific implants, while surface anodization may enhance osseointegration by improving cell adhesion at the bone-implant interface. This study evaluated the feasibility of porous Ti-6Al-4V implants produced by additive manufacturing and surface-modified by anodization for repairing critical-sized femoral defects. Eighty rats were assigned to four groups: control (no graft), non-anodized Ti-6Al-4V implants, nanoporous implants, and nanotubular implants. After six weeks, bone regeneration and mechanical performance were assessed. Newly formed bone volume was significantly higher in the implanted groups compared to control (24.62 ± 3.11%), reaching 47.25 ± 3.92% (non-anodized), 58.20 ± 5.39% (nanoporous), and 40.72 ± 2.22% (nanotubular). Bone strength was also greater in implanted groups (150.27 ± 2.94 N, 151.98 ± 10.37 N, and 156.59 ± 4.95 N, respectively) compared to control (128.16 ± 2.17 N), with no significant differences among treated groups. No signs of implant rejection or inflammation were observed, indicating good biocompatibility. Anodized surfaces demonstrated enhanced osteogenic performance, particularly in the nanoporous group. These findings indicate that anodized porous Ti-6Al-4V implants produced by additive manufacturing combine biological compatibility with mechanical stability, supporting their potential application in bone reconstruction therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.