Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196355›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Essential Oils as a Source of Anticancer Molecules: Critical Assessment of Current Evidence and Methodological Limitations-A Systematic Review.

Renato Spigarelli, Maria Chiara Valerii, Alberto Bernacchi, Nikolas Kostantine Dussias, Lina Mbirki, Enzo Spisni

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renato SpigarelliDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1870-7536
Maria Chiara ValeriiDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Alberto BernacchiDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-5316-5112
Nikolas Kostantine DussiasInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Unit, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1338-9361
Lina MbirkiLaboratory of Integrated Physiology (LR17ES02), Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte 7021, Tunisia.
Enzo SpisniDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8525-2981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) and their bioactive constituents have attracted growing interest as potential anticancer agents because they can target multiple pathways involved in tumor progression. However, the literature on their anticancer activity is highly heterogeneous and often limited by methodological weaknesses that reduce the reliability and translational value of the reported findings. This systematic review critically assessed the anticancer activity of EOs and EO-derived compounds by considering only studies that met defined methodological criteria. A PubMed search identified 872 articles published between 2015 and 2026, of which 97 were retained after screening based on EO chemical characterization, evaluation of cancer selectivity using non-tumoral control cells, and direct assessment of EO-driven anticancer effects. Across different tumor models, EOs and their constituents consistently showed selective cytotoxic or antiproliferative activity, commonly associated with oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, cell-cycle arrest, and modulation of oncogenic pathways. Some studies also reported reduced migration, invasion, and tumor-promoting signaling, while nanoformulation improved stability and efficacy in selected models. Overall, despite encouraging preclinical evidence, the translational potential of EO-based anticancer strategies remains limited by recurrent methodological shortcomings and insufficient in vivo validation. Standardized experimental criteria will be essential to improve reproducibility and support future clinical development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsOils, VolatileAnimalsApoptosisCell ProliferationHumansAntineoplastic AgentsOils, Volatileanticancer activityessential oilsexperimental methodologynatural productstumor selectivity

Identifiers

PMID42196355
PMCPMC13207076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.