ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Determinants of Protein Folding Pathways: Lessons from Metamorphic Proteins.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The protein folding problem has traditionally been defined by two complementary challenges: predicting the three-dimensional structure of a protein from its amino acid sequence and understanding the mechanism by which this structure is attained. While recent advances in artificial intelligence have largely addressed the former, the latter remains unresolved. Early studies showed that many small proteins fold in a cooperative two-state manner, shifting attention toward transition states and energy landscapes. Comparative analyses of protein families further revealed that folding mechanisms are often conserved among proteins sharing the same topology, suggesting a dominant role of structure in shaping folding pathways. However, this framework does not explain when and how a protein commits to a specific topology. Metamorphic proteins, in which highly similar sequences adopt distinct native folds, provide a powerful complementary approach. Studies of these systems show that closely related sequences can follow different folding mechanisms without sharing common intermediates. These findings indicate that folding pathways are determined at very early stages and are encoded within the denatured ensemble through subtle structural and energetic biases. Here, we review the evolution of protein folding studies and propose a unified view in which folding mechanisms are selected early, with the denatured state playing a central role in defining both folding pathways and final topology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.