ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Gut Microbial Dysbiosis and Male Reproductive Health: Current Insights and Future Directions.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Male infertility contributes to approximately half of all infertility cases, with a substantial proportion remaining idiopathic. Emerging evidence implicates the gut microbiome as a regulator of male reproductive health through a proposed gut-testis axis. Few studies have shown that gut microbial dysbiosis may impair sperm quality via multiple mechanisms, including disruption of endocrine function (e.g., reduced testosterone production), alterations in microbial-derived metabolites, and impaired testicular energy metabolism. Increased intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation may further compromise the blood-testis barrier, while translocation of bacterial endotoxins may also contribute to testicular damage. Collectively, these processes can disrupt spermatogenesis and negatively affect sperm parameters, such as concentration, motility, and morphology. Interventions that restore microbial balance, including dietary modulation, have shown potential in reversing these effects and improving reproductive outcomes. This review summarizes and evaluates current literature linking gut microbial dysbiosis to male reproductive dysfunction. Key methodological limitations and knowledge gaps are highlighted, providing a foundation for advancing the development of gut microbiome-based interventions to improve male reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.