ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Structure Variations and 3D Genome Disruption: Implications in Safety of hPSC-Based Cell Therapy.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are a promising source for regenerative medicine due to their self-renewal and differentiation capacities. However, genetic instability acquired during reprogramming and in vitro culture presents major safety challenges for clinical translation. Recurrent mutations, especially structural variants (SVs), are of particular concern as they can impair differentiation and increase tumorigenic risk. In this review, we establish and systematically explore a central causal axis: SVs-three dimensional (3D) genome disruption-safety of hPSC-based therapy. We propose that SVs critically compromise therapeutic safety by perturbing the 3D architecture of the genome, leading to pathogenic rewiring of enhancer-promoter interactions. This rewiring, exemplified by "enhancer hijacking" and "enhancer loss," can aberrantly activate oncogenes or silence tumor suppressors even in the absence of copy number variations. Thus, 3D genome disruption provides a key mechanistic explanation for SV-driven tumorigenic potential and impaired differentiation fidelity in hPSCs. By highlighting this causal axis, our review not only advances the mechanistic understanding of SV-associated risks but also provides actionable insights for the development of more rigorous quality standards for hPSC-based cell therapy products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.