ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Retention and Acceptability of a Linkage-to-Care Intervention Among Patients with Chronic Conditions in Rural South Africa.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is rising globally, yet access to continuous care remains limited, particularly in rural low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated the acceptability and psychosocial predictors of retention in a linkage-to-care (LTC) intervention for patients with chronic conditions in rural South Africa. We conducted a cross-sectional analytical study with a retrospective cohort component among 1673 patients diagnosed with hypertension, diabetes, and/or HIV in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Acceptability and psychosocial factors were assessed cross-sectionally using a theory-informed, interviewer-administered questionnaire between January and June 2024. Retention in care over the preceding six months (July-December 2023) was extracted from routine clinic records and classified as consistent (no gaps > 6 months between visits) or inconsistent (≥1 gap > 6 months. Logistic regression examined associations between psychosocial factors and retention outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, marital status, and diagnostic category. Overall, 25.1% of participants maintained consistent retention over six months, while 74.9% were retained inconsistently. Acceptability of the LTC intervention varied significantly by diagnosis (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.