ReviewNutrients2026
Dietary Antioxidants and Redox Signaling in Cancer Prevention: Mechanistic Insights and Metabolic Inflammation.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxidative stress is an important component of cancer biology and is characterized by an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defense systems. Excess ROS can cause molecular damage and genomic instability; at the same time, ROS signaling remains necessary for normal cellular function. Redox homeostasis is of particular importance in this balance. The aim of this structured narrative review was to summarize and critically discuss current evidence on how dietary antioxidants influence redox-sensitive pathways involved in cancer prevention, with particular attention to metabolic inflammation, mitochondrial quality control, and gut microbiota-related mechanisms. We performed a structured literature search of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, focusing on articles published between 2021 and 2026. The evidence covered major redox-sensitive pathways, including Nrf2-Keap1-ARE signaling, AMPK-mTOR regulation, NF-κB-mediated inflammation, mitochondrial quality control (autophagy and mitophagy), and inflammasome activation. These pathways, which are involved in tumor initiation and progression, link oxidative stress to metabolic and inflammatory processes. Current evidence suggests that dietary antioxidants act primarily by supporting endogenous defense systems. This may help explain the "antioxidant paradox", in which antioxidant-rich dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of cancer. In some studies, high-dose supplementation with isolated antioxidants has produced inconsistent or sometimes adverse results. These effects depend on dose, chemical form, metabolic context, and baseline redox state. The gut microbiota is also an important mediator of antioxidant bioactivity; by converting dietary polyphenols into bioactive metabolites, it can influence systemic redox balance and metabolic signaling. This microbiota-dependent modulation may partially explain inter-individual variability in responses to dietary interventions. In conclusion, dietary antioxidants should be considered as modulators of redox-sensitive signaling networks, not merely as simple radical scavengers. Personalized modulation of redox homeostasis is a future strategy for cancer prevention, with a greater emphasis on whole-diet and biomarker-guided approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.