ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Prediction of Center-of-Mass Kinematics of Sensopro Exercises with Neural Network Models.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring center-of-mass is crucial for assessing postural control, but field measurements are often impractical or cost-prohibitive. This study investigates the feasibility of predicting center-of-mass kinematics from the motion of an unstable base-the Sensopro Luna-using deep learning, eliminating the need for wearable sensors. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which 64 participants were recorded performing three coordination exercises (Single-Leg Stance, Stepping, and Waves). Marker-based motion capture and auxiliary inertial sensors were used to record reference and tape kinematics. The model inputs consisted of IMU- and motion-capture-derived tape segment orientations, IMU accelerations and angular velocities, and algorithmic estimates of the lowest tape positions. Nine axis-specific exercise models were developed using a hybrid Encoder-LSTM-Decoder architecture and compared against linear regression baselines. Our results indicate that the deep learning models successfully predicted horizontal center-of-mass displacements (DNN Mean Absolute Errors of 16.1-23.7 mm for X-axis and 4.4-31.3 mm for Y-axis) and exhibited descriptively lower errors than linear models in mean absolute error and signal morphology. However, vertical predictions were less reliable, likely due to the physical constraints inherent to the kinematics of the unstable base. Error analysis revealed that prediction accuracy was highest within common postural ranges, but decreased for extreme displacements. These findings provide a proof-of-concept for wearable-free postural monitoring, particularly for movement along the mediolateral and sagittal axes. Such a system could facilitate automated, cost-effective postural feedback and performance tracking in rehabilitation and fitness environments, supporting autonomous coordination training without the practical constraints of traditional measurement systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.