ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
AdaFed-LDR: Adaptive Federated Learning with Layerwise Dynamics Regularization for Robust Wi-Fi Localization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wi-Fi Channel State Information (CSI)-based indoor localization enables high-precision positioning, but its deployment across multiple environments faces two major challenges: privacy concerns from centralizing CSI data, and severe statistical heterogeneity (non-IID) arising from the strong environment-dependency of CSI. This heterogeneity creates a stability-plasticity trade-off in federated learning-maintaining precision in known environments (stability) while adapting to unseen domains (plasticity). To address this trade-off, we propose AdaFed-LDR, which combines server-side Confidence-Weighted Adaptive Aggregation with client-side Layerwise Dynamics Regularization (LDR). The aggregation recalibrates client contributions based on feature covariance changes, while LDR imposes depth-dependent constraints-stronger constraints on shallow layers to preserve environment-agnostic features and weaker constraints on deeper layers to allow environment-specific adaptation. Evaluated across 8 indoor environments using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation and 5 random seeds, AdaFed-LDR achieved a mean localization error (MLE) of 0.41 cm in known environments, corresponding to an 88.2% reduction compared with FedAvg. In domain generalization to unseen environments, AdaFed-LDR achieved an MLE of 218.2±2.8 cm, demonstrating an improvement over FedPos (257.6±14.04 cm). With one adaptation sample per reference point, MLE improved to 21 cm. Ablation experiments confirmed that combining the two proposed components achieved the highest improvement (83.9%) compared with applying them individually, supporting AdaFed-LDR as a reproducible approach to the stability-plasticity trade-off in federated CSI-based localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.