Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199260›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Prevalence of Low Back Pain in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 124 Studies.

Hamad S Al Amer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hamad S Al AmerDepartment of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5859-7258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, numerous studies have reported varying prevalence rates across populations and timeframes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence to estimate the prevalence of LBP in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Arab World Research Source, and Global Index Medicus from inception to January 2026. Quality was assessed, and pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses were performed, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on sex, age group, population type, province, geographical region, and data collection period. Results: A total of 124 studies (n = 146,552 participants) were included. Most studies targeted health workers (n = 52; 41.9%), were conducted in Riyadh province (n = 28; 22.6%), and were methodologically acceptable (n = 94; 75.8%). Prevalence estimates for point, week, year, and lifetime were 26.7% (95% CI = 16.7-39.9%; n = 16), 27.2% (95% CI = 23.7-31.1%; n = 53), 52.3% (95% CI = 49.1-55.5%; n = 100), and 64.0% (95% CI = 55.3-71.9%; n = 28), respectively, with significant heterogeneity observed ( Conclusion: LBP appears to be common across multiple population groups in Saudi Arabia, with higher prevalence among females and health workers. These findings support the need for targeted preventive strategies. However, the estimates should be interpreted with caution due to substantial heterogeneity across studies and the predominance of occupational and student-based samples, which may limit their generalizability. Further research in underrepresented populations and regions is warranted.

Indexed as

low back painmeta-analysisprevalenceSaudi Arabiasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42199260
PMCPMC13199623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.