ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Prevalence of Low Back Pain in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 124 Studies.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unilateral Balance, Muscular Strength, Foot Arch Status, and Physical Performance in Young Adults with and Without Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, numerous studies have reported varying prevalence rates across populations and timeframes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence to estimate the prevalence of LBP in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Arab World Research Source, and Global Index Medicus from inception to January 2026. Quality was assessed, and pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses were performed, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on sex, age group, population type, province, geographical region, and data collection period. Results: A total of 124 studies (n = 146,552 participants) were included. Most studies targeted health workers (n = 52; 41.9%), were conducted in Riyadh province (n = 28; 22.6%), and were methodologically acceptable (n = 94; 75.8%). Prevalence estimates for point, week, year, and lifetime were 26.7% (95% CI = 16.7-39.9%; n = 16), 27.2% (95% CI = 23.7-31.1%; n = 53), 52.3% (95% CI = 49.1-55.5%; n = 100), and 64.0% (95% CI = 55.3-71.9%; n = 28), respectively, with significant heterogeneity observed ( Conclusion: LBP appears to be common across multiple population groups in Saudi Arabia, with higher prevalence among females and health workers. These findings support the need for targeted preventive strategies. However, the estimates should be interpreted with caution due to substantial heterogeneity across studies and the predominance of occupational and student-based samples, which may limit their generalizability. Further research in underrepresented populations and regions is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.