ReviewDialogues in health2026
From pantry to physiology: A narrative review linking food insecurity to biological dysfunction.
Review in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food insecurity is an escalating public health and social equity challenge with measurable biological consequences. Defined as limited or uncertain access to nutritionally adequate and safe foods, it affects millions of households in the United States and is increasingly recognized as a driver of chronic disease. While research on food insecurity has expanded across public health, nutrition, and social science, understanding of its biological mechanisms remains fragmented. Methods: Using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines, this narrative review synthesizes interdisciplinary evidence connecting food insecurity to physiological dysfunction, integrating findings from epidemiologic, clinical, and mechanistic studies. It explores the following: (1) general health and life expectancy; (2) cardiovascular disease; (3) diabetes; (4) nutrition, weight, and metabolic health; (5) mental health and sleep; and (6) immune function. Across these domains, chronic nutritional instability and psychosocial stress are linked to hormonal and inflammatory dysregulation, metabolic disturbance, and increased allostatic load. Results: These mechanisms demonstrate that food insecurity operates not only as a social condition but as a biologically embedded stressor. Further coordination is needed to address both biological and structural drivers of disease. Conclusions: Food insecurity should be recognized as a modifiable determinant of physiological health and health equity. These findings align with global health priorities, including SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), highlighting food insecurity as a key driver of health disparities. Integrating insights from nutrition science, medicine, and social policy is essential to develop effective, multisector interventions. This review underscores the need for cross-sector collaboration to bridge nutrition science, medicine, and social policy, reframing food insecurity as a modifiable determinant of physiological health and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.