ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Emerging frontiers in glioma therapy: the evolving role of glioma vaccines.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma, particularly glioblastoma (GBM), remains one of the most lethal primary brain tumors, characterized by aggressive biological behavior, profound intratumoral heterogeneity, and a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Despite encouraging advances in cancer immunotherapy, durable clinical benefit from glioma vaccines has remained limited, highlighting a substantial translational gap between early immunogenicity and long-term therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we provide an integrative overview of current glioma vaccine strategies, including peptide-based, dendritic cell-based, nucleic acid-based, and autologous tumor-derived platforms, with a particular focus on their biological rationale, clinical performance, and translational limitations. Rather than merely summarizing recent developments, we critically examine the shared factors that have constrained clinical success, including antigen heterogeneity, immune escape, HLA restriction, treatment-related immunosuppression, and the inhibitory effects of the glioma tumor microenvironment. We further discuss how these challenges have shaped the emerging rationale for combination strategies involving vaccines with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, immune checkpoint blockade, and other immunotherapeutic modalities. Finally, we highlight forward-looking design principles for next-generation glioma vaccines, including improved antigen selection, biomarker-guided patient stratification, microenvironment-aware therapeutic design, and more predictive translational models. Overall, we propose that future progress in glioma vaccine therapy will depend not only on improving vaccine platforms themselves, but also on integrating them into biologically rational and clinically informed therapeutic frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.