Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199700›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026

Ubiquitination in intervertebral disc degeneration: from mechanisms to potential therapeutic strategies.

Xuening Liu, Xuewen Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xuening LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, PR China.
Xuewen KangDepartment of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is the primary cause of low back pain, imposing a heavy economic burden on individuals and society. The pathogenesis of IDD involves complex pathological processes. The interaction of extracellular matrix metabolism, regulated cell death (such as apoptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy), cell senescence, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response collectively contribute to the development of IDD. As a widespread post-translational modification, ubiquitination modulates various biological processes by regulating the activity and stability of proteins, including cell signal transduction, cell metabolism, and cell cycle. Recent studies have shown that ubiquitination plays an important role in the pathological process of IDD. This review systematically elucidates the molecular mechanisms by which ubiquitination regulates the progression of IDD. In addition, we summarize ubiquitination-based therapeutic strategies, including natural molecules, small-molecule compounds, extracellular vesicles, and bioactive materials. This review provides new insights and potential targets for understanding the molecular mechanisms of IDD as well as the treatment. The translational potential of this article: This study systematically clarifies the regulatory network of ubiquitination in IDD and identifies specific E3 ligases and DUBs as potential targets. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the advantages and challenges of ubiquitination-based therapeutic strategies, providing novel insights with both mechanistic depth and broad application prospects for breaking through the bottlenecks in the clinical treatment of IDD.

Indexed as

Extracellular matrixInflammatory responseIntervertebral disc degenerationNucleus pulposusRegulated cell deathUbiquitination

Identifiers

PMID42199700
PMCPMC13199847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.