Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42200005›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Application and research progress of single-port laparoscopy in retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies.

Ruinan Song, Jiaqiang Xiong, Rourou Xiao, Yuexiong Yi, Jing Cheng, Xiwen Wang, Juyuan Huang, Jiahui Zhao, Qiongying Lyu, Yurou Chen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruinan Song *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiaqiang Xiong *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Rourou Xiao *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuexiong YiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jing ChengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiwen WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Juyuan HuangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiahui ZhaoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qiongying LyuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yurou ChenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has been widely used to eradicate locoregional disease, improve staging accuracy, and guide adjuvant therapy in the surgical treatment of gynecologic oncological patients. Although multi-port laparoscopy and open surgery can both effectively achieve retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, they are associated with greater surgical trauma and longer postoperative recovery, particularly in obese patients and those with prior surgical histories. In contrast, single-port laparoscopy is an innovative alternative surgical approach for retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. This technique can offer potential advantages, such as improved cosmetic outcomes, reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and improvements in postoperative quality of life. Nonetheless, single-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy remains controversial. This article provides a narrative clinical review of the current evidence on single-port laparoscopy for retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies and is supplemented by a structured literature review and quantitative synthesis of selected comparative studies. Major concerns include the risk of injury to surrounding organs during difficult dissections, the completeness of lymph node removal, patient survival benefits, appropriate patient selection, and the learning curve. This review summarizes key anatomical considerations, current surgical techniques, and advancements in instrumentation, ongoing technical challenges, and future directions of single-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.

Indexed as

3D laparoscopyAI navigationgynecologic neoplasmsretroperitoneal lymphadenectomyrobotic technologysingle-port laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42200005
PMCPMC13199314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.