ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Medication Adherence Among Home-Dwelling Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elderly chronic disease management is often complicated by multimorbidity and the need for lifelong polypharmacy, yet poor adherence severely impedes progress. Existing studies mainly focus on exploring influencing factors of medication adherence, while most predictive models lack model interpretability and rarely integrate psychological and social support factors for community elderly populations. Predictive models identifying risk of adherence could enable proactive intervention. Objective: To develop an interpretable machine learning prediction model that fills the above research gap to predict the medication adherence of elderly patients with chronic diseases in China. Methods: From January to December 2024, data were collected from chronic disease patients aged 60 years and older receiving home-based medication therapy through face-to-face interviews conducted by pharmacists. Variables included demographic information, comorbidities, chronic diseases and medications information, medication adherence, self-efficacy in rational drug use, medication beliefs, social support, and medication literacy. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a test set at a 7:3 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on all data, and predictors were selected from the training set via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Six machine learning algorithms were applied in R software to develop predictive models using the training set, and their performance was compared on the test set. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) approach was used to interpret the optimal model. Results: A total of 1722 patients were included in the statistical analysis. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) exhibited the best predictive performance among the six models (AUC = 0.811, 95% CI 0.774-0.840), with its core predictors being self-efficacy in rational drug use, medication practice, concern beliefs, and availability of social support. Through SHAP analysis, the interpretability of the model was significantly enhanced, providing a clear decision-making basis for clinicians. Conclusion: We constructed a prediction model for home medication adherence in elderly patients with chronic diseases, which incorporates important social and psychological factors affecting patients' adherence and provides robust evidence for developing targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.