ArticleBlood advances2026
A comprehensive multicenter study assessing the impact of abelacimab, asundexian, and milvexian on coagulation assays.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational Development of Oral FXIa Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of Molecular Design, Pharmacology, and Indication-Specific Clinical Evidence.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPhase 3 trials evaluating inhibitors of coagulation factor XI (FXI) and/or its activated form (FXIa) as novel anticoagulant drugs are ongoing. These agents include parenteral monoclonal antibody (abelacimab) and oral small molecules (milvexian, asundexian). We investigated the extent to which standard and specialized coagulation assays are affected by FXI(a) inhibitors in a multicenter study involving 23 laboratories. FXI(a) inhibitors were spiked into pooled normal plasma at concentrations covering those observed in phase 2/3 clinical trials: 50 to 2000 ng/mL for milvexian and asundexian, and 1 to 30 μg/mL for abelacimab. Actual plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Assays were performed blindly using 5 to 11 different combinations of reagent/analyzer depending on the assay. Prothrombin time, Clauss fibrinogen, and clotting activity of FII, FV, FVII, and FX were not affected in a clinically relevant manner. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was prolonged in a concentration-dependent manner, with milvexian having the greatest impact followed by abelacimab and asundexian. Clotting activity of FVIII, FIX, FXI, and FXII was underestimated. Such interference was prevented by high plasma dilution (up to 1:160) before the test, except for abelacimab: FXI clotting activity remained decreased, even at low concentration (2.5 μg/mL). FXI(a) inhibitors did not affect lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing using dilute Russell viper venom time but may lead to false-negative result with LA-sensitive aPTT reagents. Protein C anticoagulant activity was overestimated, whereas no impact on protein S anticoagulant activity was observed. This study provides a comprehensive laboratory framework for interpreting clotting assays in future patients receiving FXI(a) inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.