ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Advanced molecular detection, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence era in medical laboratory science education.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical and positive uses of AI in STEM education: taming the AI tiger.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid growth of molecular diagnostics, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) has transformed laboratory science, but how far accredited medical laboratory science programs in the United States have adopted their education and training requirements to these advances is still unclear. Using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation framework, we conducted a nationwide review of 489 program websites and a voluntary Qualtrics survey of 67 program directors. Website data showed that 46.3% of programs offered molecular diagnostics coursework, while bioinformatics (0.8%) and AI (0.2%) content were nearly absent. Survey results supported this pattern. Directors rated sequencing and AI-based tools as increasingly important for workforce readiness. Still, they reported significant barriers to adoption, including limited curriculum time (86.6%), lack of faculty expertise (68.7%), budget constraints (68.7%), and insufficient infrastructure (67.2%). Programs that incorporated molecular diagnostics required significantly more total credits and longer program duration. The findings indicate that molecular content has entered the early majority phase of adoption, while computational technologies remain confined to early innovators. To address these gaps, directors emphasized the need for standardized national curriculum guidelines, expanded faculty training, and stronger institutional support. This study highlights the urgent need for coordinated educational strategies to prepare graduates for the growing molecular and computational demands of the modern clinical laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.