ArticleJournal of virology2026
Narrowed host ranges do not constrain future host range expansion in RNA phage Φ6.
Article in Journal of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA viruses frequently shift between different host species and emerge on novel hosts. Part of this evolutionary process can involve specialization, when viruses adapt to increase their fitness on a particular host, often at the expense of their ability to infect other hosts. This trajectory has the potential to lead to extreme host narrowing, which excludes all other previously accessible hosts. The consequences of the evolutionary history of host specialization on a virus's future evolutionary potential are understudied. Using previously evolved specialized strains of model dsRNA bacteriophage Φ6, which had lost their ability to infect some hosts, we challenged specialists to adapt to their ancestral and other challenge hosts and identified resulting mutations. We found that these specialists readily re-gained their broader host ranges, at rates comparable to previously observed emergence events in Φ6, indicating a lack of potential constraint from their mutational backgrounds due to epistasis. While some viral strains achieved host range re-expansion by reversing the original host-narrowing mutations gained during specialization, others used secondary mutations, which were found to be parallel mutations previously associated with Φ6 entry into those host species. This study contributes to our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of host shifting in RNA viruses and their strategies to re-expand following specialization, which is relevant to spillback events and recurring host shifts that are observed in nature.IMPORTANCEThe consequences of RNA virus specialization on a virus's future evolutionary potential are not well understood. This study addresses the gap in the literature by investigating the mechanisms of viral host range re-expansion using a model RNA virus. We found that RNA viruses readily re-expand their host ranges to infect both novel and previously accessible hosts, both by mutational reversion and secondary mutations. Investigating these evolutionary mechanisms improves understanding of recurring host shifts and spillback events, which occur often in nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.