ReviewNeuroSci2026
Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may improve cognition and promote underlying brain health through various mechanisms including the noradrenaline and cholinergic pathways. Whilst early human studies used invasive devices (iVNS), recent decades have seen the emergence of non-invasive devices that stimulate the vagus nerve transcutaneously (tVNS) via either the cervical branches in the neck (tcVNS) or the auricular branch in the ear (taVNS). With this increase in more accessible devices, tVNS is gaining interest as a novel therapy in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). This targeted review aims to understand the current evidence in human trials in this specific population. PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched. Six human interventional studies were found (one iVNS; five taVNS). VNS is well tolerated and study designs demonstrate feasibility within this population for future blinded and appropriately powered long-term studies with participants applying tVNS at home. However, protocols and tVNS settings remain variable. Working memory domains such as verbal fluency and 3D processing show the most promise but global cognitive scores were also sensitive in some cases. The role of biomarkers of tVNS activity and its effect on AD markers and neuroinflammation should be considered in the design of future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.