ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026
Eye Movement Patterns as Robust Biomarkers for Schizophrenia Identification Using a Novel Data Transformation Approach.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although eye movement abnormalities are documented in schizophrenia (SZ), their translation into objective diagnostic biomarkers remains limited. In this study, we propose a novel identification framework that integrates a Sparsity-Scoring Kernel Entropy Component Analysis (SSKECA) algorithm with a multidimensional eye movement feature set. A total of 40 patients with SZ and 50 healthy controls (HC) completed a free-viewing task involving 100 distinct semantic images. The proposed SSKECA algorithm optimizes multidimensional feature representations to capture latent eye movement patterns characteristic of SZ. The SSKECA-AdaBoost model achieved competitive performance, with an accuracy of 0.933 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.960. Notably, when restricted to only 25 highly discriminative images, the SSKECA-XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of 0.922. Feature ablation analyses not only reproduced previously reported eye movement findings but also highlighted additional atypical patterns. Misclassification analyses revealed more pronounced eye movement deficits in incorrectly classified SZ patients. Overall, the proposed framework translates complex eye movement patterns into robust indicators for subject-level identification, offering a practical and efficient tool to support objective assessment in SZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.