ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Variations in Macular Pigment Optical Density in Children and Adolescents Depending on Time Spent on Smartphones.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren and teenagers use electronic devices daily, especially smartphones. The use of these devices exposes children and adolescents to excess blue light, which can alter the structures of the eye, especially the retina. As a protective mechanism, the macular region contains pigments represented by lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin. In this study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the Macular Pigment Optical Density (MPOD) levels in the macula and the time spent on smartphones in children and adolescents.
methodsFifty-seven children and teenagers aged between 8 and 18 were evaluated, with a total of 114 eyes. The patients included in the study were divided into two groups: those who spent less than two hours a day on the device and those who exceeded this period. To determine the amount of macular pigment, the Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry technique was used.
resultsWe found a statistically significant difference in screen time between weekdays and weekends in favor of the latter. We compared the different refractive categories with respect to pigment levels and screen time and found no significant differences between groups. When comparing the patients with respect to environment, we found a slight difference in macular pigmentation in the favor of rural areas and also in the screen time which was shorter in rural areas. We found a strong association at all levels between longer screen time (both weekdays and weekend) and lower macular pigment quantities for both eyes. When comparing the groups with more/less than 2 h of screen time, the MPOD was lower for both eyes in the group with over 2 h screen time.
conclusionsIn this study we demonstrated that smartphone use is a risk factor leading to a decrease in MPOD in children and adolescents. The amount of lutein in the retina, brain and serum are correlated, therefore MPOD can be considered a natural biomarker of lutein and zeaxanthin levels in the body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.