Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201162›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2026

Large Language Models for Clinical Narrative Processing: Methods, Applications, and Challenges.

Achilleas Livieratos, Junjing Lin, Paraskevi Chasani, Mina Gaga, Fotios S Fousekis, Charalambos Gogos, Karolina Akinosoglou, Konstantinos H Katsanos, Margaret Gamalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Achilleas LivieratosIndependent Researcher, 152 38 Athens, Greece.
Junjing LinTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., 500 E Kendall St., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Paraskevi ChasaniDepartment of Neuropathology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürn berg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9260-0830
Mina Gaga1st Respiratory Medicine Department, Hygeia Hospital, 151 23 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-6012
Fotios S FousekisDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina School of Health Sciences, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Charalambos GogosDepartment of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Karolina AkinosoglouDepartment of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-9494
Konstantinos H KatsanosDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina School of Health Sciences, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Margaret GamaloPfizer Inc., 500 Arcola Rd., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced natural language processing and are increasingly used to analyze clinical narratives. Their ability to extract information, summarize records, and support clinical workflows makes them potential tools for enhancing documentation efficiency and the secondary application in the analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data. The aim of this work is to synthesize recent evidence on methodological approaches and applications of LLMs for clinical narrative processing, and to assess their performance, benefits, limitations, and implications for clinical practice. Across 2022-2026 studies, LLMs demonstrated strong performance in information extraction, summarization, triage prediction, section classification, and synthetic text generation, often surpassing traditional machine-learning models. Overall, LLMs improved the conversion of unstructured notes into actionable clinical insights, reduced documentation burden, and supported decision-making tasks. Key challenges included hallucinations, variable reproducibility, sensitivity to prompting, domain adaptation gaps, and limited transparency. Our findings indicate that LLMs show substantial promise for transforming clinical narrative processing, but safe adoption requires rigorous evaluation and continuous model auditing. This work provides a structured, non-systematic synthesis of representative studies and is intended as a high-level overview of emerging applications rather than a comprehensive systematic review.

Indexed as

clinical practiceelectronic health recordslarge language modelsmedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID42201162
PMCPMC13214763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.