Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42201180›Full record

ReviewGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Day Surgery in Older Adults: Safety, Effectiveness, and Best Practices for Patient Selection and Perioperative Care-A Narrative Review.

Judit Groman, Zsolt Viktor Göböl, Andrea Virág, Gyula Domján, Klara Gadó

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judit GromanMultidisciplinary Day Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1082 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt Viktor GöbölMultidisciplinary Day Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1082 Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea VirágDoctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Gyula DomjánDepartment of Geriatrics and Centre of Nursing Sciences, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Klara GadóDepartment of Geriatrics and Centre of Nursing Sciences, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing number of older adults undergoing surgical procedures requires care models that minimise hospital exposure, optimise safety, and support rapid recovery. Day surgery has become an increasingly attractive option for selected older patients, provided their medical, functional and psychosocial needs are carefully assessed. Recent developments in prehabilitation, geriatric-focused perioperative pathways and enhanced post-discharge follow-up have further expanded its potential. This narrative review aims not only to synthesise current evidence, but also to provide a clinically oriented framework for patient selection, perioperative optimisation, and safe implementation of day surgery pathways in older adults. MAIN

findingsEvidence from the past decade indicates that day surgery can be safe and effective for adults aged ≥65 when supported by structured preoperative assessment, targeted optimisation, and clear discharge criteria. Older patients benefit particularly from reduced risks of hospital-acquired complications, including infection, delirium, immobility and functional decline. Prehabilitation programmes focusing on nutrition, strength, balance and medication review are associated with improved postoperative stability and faster return to baseline function. Multidisciplinary teamwork, integrating surgeons, anaesthetists, geriatricians, nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians and caregivers, play a key role in identifying modifiable risks and ensuring continuity of care. Studies also highlight the value of post-discharge telephone follow-up, caregiver engagement and close collaboration with primary care in preventing readmissions.

conclusionsDay surgery is a viable and patient-centred option for many older adults when careful selection and preparation are combined with age-sensitive perioperative care. Most adverse outcomes can be mitigated through systematic prehabilitation, thoughtful anaesthetic planning, early mobilisation and structured follow-up. The evidence suggests that older patients may benefit from reduced hospital stay, less exposure to harm, and faster functional recovery. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings support broader integration of geriatric day surgery into routine care pathways, especially within health systems facing capacity constraints. Clinicians should consider implementing standardised geriatric assessment, multidisciplinary optimisation strategies, and robust discharge and follow-up protocols to enhance safety and effectiveness. With appropriate preparation and coordinated teamwork, day surgery can contribute meaningfully to safer, more efficient and more patient-centred surgical care for older adults.

Indexed as

day surgeryfrailtygeriatric assessmentmultidisciplinary carenosocomial infectionsolder patientspatient safetyprehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42201180
PMCPMC13293459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.