ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells in Birth Defects: Integrated Roles in Disease Modeling, Prenatal Diagnosis, and Therapy.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Birth defects impose a significant global health burden, driving an urgent need for improved prenatal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Amniotic fluid stem cells (AFSCs) have emerged as a uniquely advantageous cell source in this context. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the multifaceted roles of AFSCs in advancing fetal medicine. We begin by detailing their biological characteristics, including origin, heterogeneity, and markers, while highlighting how their properties are influenced by gestational and pathological factors. We then elaborate on their dual mechanisms of tissue repair, focusing on direct homing/engraftment and, predominantly, their potent paracrine and extracellular vesicle (EV)-mediated actions. The core of the review systematically examines the integrated applications of AFSCs across a clinical continuum: (1) in disease modeling, where they serve as a foundation for generating patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and complex organoids to study genetic disorders; (2) in prenatal diagnosis, exploring their potential contribution to fetal microchimerism and cell-free fetal DNA to refine non-invasive testing; and (3) in therapeutic interventions, reviewing preclinical progress in treating conditions such as pulmonary hypoplasia, myelomeningocele, and hematopoietic diseases via transamniotic stem cell therapy (TRASCET) or EV administration. Finally, we discuss the current limitations, including standardization hurdles and mechanistic knowledge gaps and the promising future of AFSCs, underpinned by their ethical sourcing, ease of access, and strong regenerative potential. This work consolidates the evidence positioning AFSCs as a transformative, unified platform for innovating the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of birth defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42201610What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.