ArticleNeurology and therapy2026
Inter-assay and Inter-site Performance of Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays in Synucleinopathies: A Multicenter 2 × 2 Protocol Comparison.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From a prion seed to a tree of discoveries: Byron Caughey's RT-QuIC legacy in protein misfolding research.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe α-synuclein seed amplification assay (synSAA) is a biomarker test for synucleinopathies. Different synSAA conditions have different properties, and some of these conditions enable differentiation between diseases associated with Lewy bodies versus those associated with glial inclusions. Direct cross-assay and inter-site synSAA comparisons evaluating these features remain limited.
methodsTwo synSAA conditions (identified here as sodium phosphate buffer (SPB) and piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES) SAA conditions) were tested in a controlled 2 × 2 design, each performed at two independent laboratories. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 60 participants was analyzed, comprising 29 multiple system atrophy (MSA) samples and 31 additional CSF samples including 16 Parkinson's disease/dementia with Lewy bodies (PD/DLB) cases previously screened using SPB-SAA conditions, and 15 neurology ward controls, which were used as analytical controls.
resultsInter-site concordance was high for SPB-SAA (100%) and PIPES-SAA (95%, 0.913 Fleiss' kappa). Compared to clinical diagnosis, sensitivity for detecting synSAA+ MSA cases was 75.0% for PIPES-SAA_A and 81.4% for PIPES-SAA_C, with specificities of 76.9% and 92.3%, respectively. SPB-SAA did not detect MSA at either of the two sites and showed 100% specificity. Inter-assay concordance was high for PD/DLB (88%) and controls (86%), but low for MSA (31%), reflecting the different sensitivity in MSA cases. The overall inter-assay concordance yielded a Fleiss' kappa of 0.23.
conclusionBoth synSAA conditions exhibit high reproducibility and replicability across laboratories yet differ in their diagnostic profiles: PIPES-SAA conditions enable detection of synuclein seeds in MSA, while SPB-SAA conditions showed high specificity for PD/DLB but not detect synuclein seeds in MSA. These findings support context-dependent assay selection and underscore the need for larger multicenter validation of analytical tools intended for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.