ArticlePloS one2026
Examining individual, health service, and experience of care determinants of patients' satisfaction - A cross-sectional facility-based study in KP, Pakistan.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health systems aim to meet populations' needs and to spur their satisfaction, requiring to first understand what drives this satisfaction, and whether these drivers come from the health system or not. In this empirical study, we use survey data from 666 patients exiting outpatient services of 60 public and 62 private health facilities in four districts of the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The survey tool assessed patients' socio-economic status, satisfaction with health service provision, and experiences of care (respect of privacy, out-of-pocket expenditures, availability of drugs). First, we synthesized the 16 items relating to satisfaction into a 12-item scale Patient Satisfaction score, relying on a Principal Component Analysis. Second, we used this score as the outcome in a linear model to identify its determinants. We found a generally high level of satisfaction regarding outpatient services within the sample, with an average satisfaction score of 76.37 out of 100. We did not find any association between satisfaction characteristics of the environment (type of facility, district). Women displayed significantly lower (-16%) and insured patients significantly higher (+6%) satisfaction scores. Indicators of healthcare experiences were found to be the strongest determinants of satisfaction, namely: satisfaction scores were 12% higher when privacy was respected, 5% higher when prescribed drugs were available and they also varied with the amount of healthcare expenses (positively and then negatively). Our results highlight the importance of designing policies that address the needs of specific population sub-groups and of ensuring access to core aspects of healthcare delivery, as reflected in patients' experiences, across all facility types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.