Evidence mapPaperPMID 42202243Full record

Trial reportNeurology2026

Vamorolone for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Cross-Trial Efficacy Comparison With Classic Corticosteroids From the FOR-DMD Trial.

Paula R Clemens, Anders Berglund, Marianela Schiava, Meredith K James, Michael P McDermott, Katherine Bushby, Erik Lampa, Edward Thomas James Rochford, Leanne M Ward, Robert C Griggs and 2 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01603407 phase3completednot on this map

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Double-blind Randomized Trial to Find Optimum Steroid Regimen

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RochesterRan2013 to 2019Enrolled196ConditionsDuchenne Muscular DystrophyArmsPrednisone, Deflazacort
NCT03439670 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase IIb Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo- and Active-controlled Study With Double-Blind Extension to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone in Ambulant Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorReveraGen BioPharma, Inc.Ran2018 to 2021Enrolled121ConditionsDuchenne Muscular DystrophyArmsVamorolone, Prednisone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paula R ClemensDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0652-6703
Anders BerglundEpistat AB, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-9861
Marianela SchiavaJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2709-265X
Meredith K JamesJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8078-7744
Michael P McDermottDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Centre, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7443-9145
Katherine BushbyJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.
Erik LampaEpistat AB, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3268-8810
Edward Thomas James RochfordFreelance Medical Writer, Italy.
Leanne M WardDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-9185
Robert C GriggsDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Centre, NY; and.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-4854
Eric P HoffmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University-SUNY, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-5139
Michela GuglieriJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-0637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesVamorolone demonstrated similar efficacy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) compared with prednisone in a 24-week exploratory analysis and may reduce key side effects compared with classic corticosteroids. In this study, we compare the efficacy and anthropometric effect of vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d with prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d and deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d in steroid-naïve boys aged 4 to <7 years using data from 2 trials.

methodsVISION-DMD was a phase 2b, 48-week randomized, double-blind trial assessing vamorolone 2 and 6 mg/kg/d vs placebo and prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d to 24 weeks. Finding the Optimum Steroid Regimen for DMD (FOR-DMD) was a double-blind, parallel-group randomized trial comparing daily prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d, daily deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d, and intermittent prednisone 0.75 mg/kg (10/10 days on/off). Entropy balancing generated weighted data for mixed model for repeated measures analyses that compared VISION-DMD vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d efficacy and anthropometric outcomes with FOR-DMD prednisone and deflazacort outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Inclusion criteria were boys with genetically confirmed DMD, age 4 to <7 years, ambulatory, and able to complete a time-to-stand (TTSTAND) assessment in <10 seconds at baseline.

resultsAll interventions showed motor improvements relative to baseline at 6 and 12 months. Using the weighted cohorts and at 12 months, vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d (n = 28) had similar changes in TTSTAND velocity, the primary motor endpoint component in both trials, vs daily prednisone (n = 50) or deflazacort (n = 55; mean baseline age 5.42 years all groups), but with CIs overlapping minimal clinically important thresholds of 0.023 rises per second (TTSTAND velocity least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% CI]: vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d vs prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d, 0.004 rises per second [-0.025 to 0.032] and vs deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d, 0.001 rises per second [-0.027 to 0.028]). Body mass index (BMI) DISCUSSION: Vamorolone demonstrated numerically similar TTSTAND velocity changes to prednisone and deflazacort at 1 year; however, interpretations of differences are limited by 95% CIs crossing minimally important difference thresholds. Further evidence of the growth-protective effect of vamorolone was observed; however, all treatments increased BMI. Vamorolone provides a linear growth-protective classic corticosteroid alternative. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03439670; NCT01603407. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This Class III study did not definitively identify differences in efficacy between vamorolone and classic corticosteroids but found that vamorolone protects linear growth in boys with DMD.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesMuscular Dystrophy, DuchennePrednisonePregnadienediolsPregnenedionesChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesdeflazacortPrednisonePregnadienediolsPregnenediones

Identifiers

PMID42202243
PMCPMC13225239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.