ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Inferring tumor absolute copy number and clonal substructure from single-cell chromatin accessibility.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate inference of absolute copy numbers beyond simple gains and losses from single-cell chromatin accessibility (scATAC-seq) data remains challenging, thereby obscuring the distinction between genetic and epigenetically driven oncogenic dependencies. Here, we present TeaCNV, a computational framework that reconstructs clonal absolute copy number profiles and tumor clonal architectures from scATAC-seq data without matched DNA baselines. Through validation both in silico and against bulk whole-genome sequencing in renal cell carcinomas, TeaCNV resolved subclonal absolute copy number profiles with less than 10% error and detected copy number variations (CNVs) with 98.6% accuracy, outperforming existing methods. Applied to six cancer types including renal, breast, pancreatic, head and neck, colorectal, and ovarian cancers, TeaCNV delineated polyclonal architectures and revealed distinct chromatin accessibility patterns driven by CNVs in key driver genes, including AKT2, ZNF217, and SOX2. By enabling absolute copy number profiling and clonal deconvolution from epigenomic assays, TeaCNV bridges critical gaps in studying oncogenic dependencies and genotype-phenotype relationships at single-cell resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.