ArticlePlacenta2026
Machine learning identification of maternal inflammatory response and systemic inflammatory response from placental membrane whole slide images.
Article in Placenta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Benchmarking pathology foundation models for non-neoplastic pathology in the placenta.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe placenta forms a critical barrier to infection through pregnancy, labor and, delivery. Acute placental inflammation in the membranes, diagnosed as Maternal Inflammatory Response (MIR), has short-term, and long-term consequences for offspring health. Digital pathology and machine learning can play an important role in understanding placental inflammation. The goal of this work is to develop machine learning models to predict pathologist-classified MIR stages from based on whole slide images (WSI) and establish early benchmarks.
methodsWe used digitized histopathology whole slide images (WSI), the UNI foundation model and the Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) framework to predict MIR from WSI images. To assess the relationship between local and systemic inflammation, we also attempt prediction of white blood cells count (WBC) and maximum fever temperature (Tmax). To analyze model performance, we built a classifier to identify inflammation in individual patches extracted from whole slide images.
resultsWe were able to classify MIR with a balanced accuracy of up to 88.4% with a Cohen's Kappa (κ) of up to 0.758. We found that deviations from the pathologist's diagnoses were driven unusually low or high frequencies of patches with inflammation. For WBC and Tmax prediction, we found mild correlation between actual values and those predicted from histopathology WSIs. DISCUSSION: MIR staging is reasonably well predicted using MIL on WSIs. We show a weak but statistically significant correlation between histologic findings and maternal systemic inflammation. These findings could be used to improve reliability of classification and prediction of neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.