ReviewTranslational stroke research2026
Intercellular Mitochondrial Transfer as Endogenous Neuroprotection: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications in Ischemic Stroke.
Review in Translational stroke research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Current reperfusion therapies are limited by narrow therapeutic time windows and the risk of secondary reperfusion injury, underscoring the urgent need for novel translatable neuroprotective targets. Mitochondrial dysfunction serves as a central hub in the ischemic cascade, contributing to energy failure, oxidative stress, calcium dysregulation, and various forms of programmed cell death. Recently, intercellular mitochondrial transfer has emerged as a crucial form of metabolic communication within the neurovascular unit (NVU). In the context of ischemia-reperfusion, donor cells can transfer functional mitochondria to compromised cells, facilitating metabolic rescue and remodeling the local microenvironment. Extensive in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that astrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and pericytes can deliver mitochondria to neurons or brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) through mechanisms such as tunneling nanotubes (TNTs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and gap junctions. This transfer helps maintain blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and promotes neurological recovery. The process is finely regulated by inflammatory signaling, metabolic reprogramming, and epigenetic modulation, all of which influence the directionality and functional outcomes of the transfer. As a result, pharmacotherapies, non-pharmacological interventions, and direct mitochondrial transplantation have demonstrated considerable neuroprotective potential in experimental models and early-stage clinical research. However, challenges related to transfer selectivity, the durability of effects, delivery efficiency, and immune safety still hinder clinical translation. Future efforts must prioritize elucidating the underlying mechanisms, standardizing protocols, and developing precise stratification strategies to advance mitochondrial transfer-based interventions from proof-of-concept to a controllable and evaluable therapeutic option for stroke treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.