Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204142›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Pangenome and resequencing analyses reveal flowering evolution and genetic control in Cerasus.

Songtao Jiu, Yahui Lei, Linlin Fang, Yue Huang, Wenbo Chen, Yan Xu, Lei Wang, Zhengxin Lv, Xunju Liu, Lu Han and 37 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Songtao Jiu *Department of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China. jiusongtao@sjtu.edu.cn.
Yahui Lei *College of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-5953-7433
Linlin FangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Yue HuangCollege of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-6572-2341
Wenbo ChenCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-4771-9437
Yan XuDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Lei WangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Zhengxin LvDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Xunju LiuDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Lu HanDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-2497
Boyang LiuDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Chen ZhangGrandOmics Biosciences, Beijing, PR China.
Xiao DongCollege of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China.
Taoxian ZhangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Jiawei WangShandong Institute of Pomology, Taian, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-5598-2115
Xu ZhangKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Cherry, Shanghai, PR China.
Yuliang CaiCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, PR China.
Wei ZhengDalian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dalian, PR China.
Fangdong LiKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Cherry, Shanghai, PR China.
Congli LiuZhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, PR China.
Hongwen LiHorticulture Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, PR China.
Jijun ZhuShanghai Botanical Garden, Shanghai, PR China.
Fei YuHorticultural Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, PR China.
Ming LiZhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, PR China.
Jing WangForestry and Fruit Research Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, PR China.
Long ChenChangli Institute of Pomology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinhuangdao, PR China.
Chunjin YinDali Bai Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Extension, Dali, PR China.
Lei PengCollege of Landscape and Horticulture, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China.
Jiyuan WangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Zhuo ZhangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Xiaojuan AnDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Lixia YuShanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, PR China.
Ruie LiuDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Yan ZhangHorticultural Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, PR China.
Li WangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Yaqin WuChangli Institute of Pomology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinhuangdao, PR China.
Anthony BernardINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, UMR BFP, Bordeaux, France.
Mitsuho NakagomiThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Shiping WangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Dirlewanger ElisabethINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, UMR BFP, Bordeaux, France.
Dawei LiCollege of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China.
Qi ZhaoCollege of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China.
Hongzhang XueThe School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Yang DongCollege of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-6212-3055
Zongyi SunGrandOmics Biosciences, Beijing, PR China. sunzongyi@163.com.
Shengchang DuanCollege of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, PR China. duanshengchang@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2728-8406
Caixi ZhangDepartment of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China. acaizh@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-111X

Funding

Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System CARS-30National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32260734National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32541114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prunus subgenus Cerasus contains numerous species with ornamental, edible, and medicinal value. However, limited genomic resources have constrained systematic analyses of structural variation and the genetic basis of key phenological traits in this group. Here, we assemble eight genomes from diverse Cerasus species. Together with 13 published genomes, we construct a pangenome of 21 accessions representing 17 species. Phenological observations reveal substantial variation in flowering time. Integrating comparative genomics, transcriptomics, and population genetic analyses highlight candidate regulators of flowering time. We find that AGAMOUS-LIKE 9 (AGL9) is strongly associated with flowering progression. Both ectopic expression and transient overexpression of PavAGL9 can accelerate post-dormancy flowering progression. We reveal that PavBPC6 binds the PavAGL9 promoter and represses its transcription, indicating a negative regulatory role. Furthermore, PavAGL9 interacts physically with PavSEP1 and PavPMADS2, suggesting synergistic roles in floral organ development. Our pangenome resource establishes a comprehensive genomic framework for Cerasus and provides insights into the regulation of flowering progression.

Indexed as

FlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantPrunusBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenomicsMADS Domain ProteinsPhylogenyPlant ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticMADS Domain ProteinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42204142
PMCPMC13216308

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.