ArticleBMC primary care2026
Use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in French urgent primary care: a national survey of general practitioners in the SOS Médecins network.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool in general practice. However, its actual use among French general practitioners (GPs) working in urgent care settings, such as SOS Médecins, a nationwide network of GPs providing home-based urgent primary care 24/7, remains poorly documented.
objectivesTo assess the prevalence, modalities of use, self-reported perceived impact, and barriers to the adoption of POCUS among GPs working in the SOS Médecins network across France.
methodsA national cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all eligible SOS Médecins GPs. The questionnaire addressed POCUS usage, clinical indications, equipment access, perceived benefits, training needs, and adoption barriers. Descriptive statistics were used, and comparisons between users and non-users were performed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.
resultsAmong 211 respondents, 47.9% reported current POCUS use. Statistically significant differences between users and non-users were observed for age group (p = 0.021) and years of experience in SOS Médecins (p = 0.003). The most frequent indications included abdominal pain (79.2%), vascular assessment (76.2%), and respiratory symptoms (65.3%). Most users relied on portable devices (69.8%) and performed focused, indication‑driven scans (87.4%). POCUS was perceived as having a positive or very positive impact on triage (86.0%), treatment decisions (81.7%), faster diagnosis (67.0%), professional autonomy (59.0%), and the doctor-patient relationship (50.0%). Nevertheless, only 15.6% of users reported billing for POCUS acts. Among non-users, the main barriers were lack of specific training (63.6%), limited time (44.5%), equipment cost (40%), and doubts about clinical utility (23.6%). More than half (54.5%) expressed interest in receiving training.
conclusionPOCUS is currently used by nearly half of SOS Médecins GPs providing urgent primary care in France. Despite strong clinical interest and perceived utility, adoption remains limited by training gaps, structural barriers, and lack of clear financial incentives. Future national strategies should prioritize the development and structuring of undergraduate POCUS education in medical schools, alongside expanded continuing training opportunities, improved financial recognition, and local mentorship initiatives, to support equitable and sustainable integration into French primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.