ArticleBMC public health2026
Willingness of volunteers in an HIV incidence cohort to participate in a future HIV vaccine trial in Kisumu County, Kenya.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFuture efficacy testing of candidate vaccines and other interventions to prevent HIV will require engagement of vulnerable populations. Here, we assessed willingness to participate in future clinical trials among participants recruited for an HIV incidence study in western Kenya. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom February 2017 to May 2018, we recruited people living without HIV who reported multiple sexual partners into a 24-month HIV incidence cohort study in Kisumu County, Kenya. At screening for study eligibility and study exit, participants completed comprehensive sociobehavioral questionnaires. They were also provided a general definition of a clinical trial and asked if they would be willing to participate in a future clinical trial of a candidate HIV vaccine. At enrollment, participants were also asked about facilitators and barriers to participation in such a clinical trial.
resultsAmong 940 individuals screened for enrollment into the HIV incidence study, 919 (97.8%) reported willingness to participate in a future clinical trial of a candidate HIV vaccine. Willing individuals were more likely than unwilling ones to have exchanged sex for goods or money (60.1% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.0237) and were less likely to believe that an individual's HIV status can be inferred by looking at them (8.7% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.0175). Willingness to participate was similarly common among participants who enrolled (608/618, 98.4%) and completed the study (518/533, 97.2%). The vast majority of the 618 enrolled participants reported obtaining HIV research information from radio/TV (n = 608, 98.1%) and newspapers/magazines/brochures (n = 579, 93.1%). Advantages they identified included HIV education (n = 594, 95.8%), access to healthcare (n = 576, 93.2%), and HIV counseling/testing (n = 574, 92.9%). Among 271 female participants, 235 (86.7%) identified free pregnancy testing as an advantage while 28 (19.4%) were unlikely to participate in a study that required the use of contraception. Among 10 enrollees who were unwilling to participate, five (50%) cited a fear of acquiring HIV and five (50%) cited fear of vaccine adverse effects.
conclusionsWe identified a highly willing population for future testing of HIV preventive vaccines. Specific barriers to participation should be addressed in recruitment efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.