Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204694›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2026

Exosome-mimetic nanocarriers in cancer diagnosis and drug delivery: engineering strategies, functional biomimicry, safety considerations, and clinical translation.

Lorena Duarte-Peña, Sheila I Peña-Corona, Fabiola V Borbolla-Jiménez, Juan Isaac Chávez-Corona, Hernán Cortés, Gareth Omar Rostro-Alonso, Octavio Daniel Reyes-Hernández, Gabriela Figueroa-González, Gerardo Leyva-Gómez, Javad Sharifi-Rad and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lorena Duarte-PeñaDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Sheila I Peña-CoronaDepartamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México, México.
Fabiola V Borbolla-JiménezDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Juan Isaac Chávez-CoronaDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Hernán CortésLaboratorio de Medicina Genómica, Departamento de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Gareth Omar Rostro-AlonsoLaboratorio de Farmacogenética, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, UMIEZ, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Octavio Daniel Reyes-HernándezLaboratorio de Farmacogenética, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, UMIEZ, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Gabriela Figueroa-GonzálezLaboratorio de Farmacogenética, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, UMIEZ, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Gerardo Leyva-GómezDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México. leyva@quimica.unam.mx.
Javad Sharifi-RadUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón , Ecuador. javadsharifirad@uees.edu.ec.
William C ChoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. chocs@ha.org.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, driving the development of advanced drug delivery systems to improve therapeutic selectivity and overcome the complex defense mechanisms of malignant cells. Exosome-mimetic nanocarriers (EMNs) have emerged as an advanced biomimetic platform for cancer diagnosis and targeted drug delivery, combining the biological functionality of natural exosomes with the manufacturing flexibility and scalability of synthetic nanocarriers. This review analyzes the composition, design, and architecture of EMNs, as well as their applications in cancer drug delivery, drawing on fundamental concepts of pharmaceutical technology to provide a translational perspective. It also includes a dedicated section on cancer diagnosis and theranostic platforms, as well as a critical analysis of recent technological advancements in exosome-mimetic systems. Although the clinical translation of natural exosomes remains limited, emerging evidence suggests that engineered EMNs offer improved scalability, reproducibility, and therapeutic versatility. Recent studies highlight their potential to overcome key limitations of natural vesicles, positioning them as promising candidates for future clinical translation and commercialization.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsExosomesNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomimeticsHumansNanomedicineAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersBiomimetic drug deliveryCancer, exosome-mimetic nanocarriersExtracellular vesiclesTargeted nanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID42204694
PMCPMC13404582

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.