ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with or without peritoneal metastases: a post-hoc analysis on RATIONALE-305 study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03777657 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Plus Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is the current first-line standard for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC), subgroup analyses in patients with peritoneal metastasis are limited and show inconsistent benefits across trials (e.g., ATTRACTION-4, CheckMate 649). This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with or without peritoneal metastases. Methods: This is an exploratory post-hoc analysis of the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 RATIONALE-305 trial. Treatment-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with advanced GC/GEJC were enrolled across 13 countries from December 13, 2018, to February 9, 2021. Patients were randomised (1:1) to tislelizumab (200 mg intravenous every 3 weeks) plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with or without peritoneal metastasis at baseline were identified and reanalysed. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population, and safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. RATIONALE-305 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03777657. Findings: Among the 997 randomised patients, 434 (43.5%) had peritoneal metastases at baseline. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS versus placebo plus chemotherapy irrespective of peritoneal metastasis status, with consistent benefits observed in patients with peritoneal metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.96) and those without peritoneal metastases (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.95). The OS benefits were greater in patients with a programmed death ligand-1 tumour area positivity score of ≥5%, regardless of peritoneal metastasis status. Significant PFS benefit was also observed with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in both patients with peritoneal metastasis (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98) and without peritoneal metastasis (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94). The safety profile was similar between treatment arms and consistent across subgroups. Interpretation: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with GC/GEJC, irrespective of the presence of peritoneal metastases, with a comparable safety profile between treatment arms. Further dedicated prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings in this population. Funding: This study was supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project, National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Young Talents Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, and Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.