ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
A mechanobiological hypothesis on bone cement-induced progression of bone metastases.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose the hypothesis that long-term alterations in the local biomechanical environment (a significant increase in stiffness and changes in stress distribution) induced by the implantation of bone cement for treating bone metastases may, by activating mechanotransduction pathways in tumor cells, potentially promote their proliferation, invasion, and therapy resistance, thereby affecting long-term disease progression. This effect is particularly noteworthy in specific patient populations with extended survival, low tumor burden, and radiosensitivity. For such patients without immediate structural instability risks, prioritizing non-invasive treatments like stereotactic radiotherapy can achieve effective symptom relief while avoiding the potential adverse biological effects associated with altering the bone's natural mechanical properties, which may lead to better long-term tumor control. This hypothesis does not challenge the critical role of bone cement in managing acute or impending pathological fractures. Instead, it advocates for a reassessment of its status as the "default" treatment option in certain specific patient populations, aiming to promote a more comprehensive balance between short-term symptom relief and long-term disease modulation in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.