ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Prediction of polycystic ovary syndrome using machine learning models: Addressing class imbalance and high dimensionality.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a hormonal disorder that affects fertility and long-term health issues such as metabolic syndrome. Class imbalance is prevalent in PCOS datasets and leads to bias toward the majority class, resulting in poor identification of the minority class. This study evaluated the impact of varying levels of class imbalance and high dimensionality on the performance of various machine learning (ML) models through a simulation study. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study involved an imbalanced PCOS dataset consisting of 41 clinical and physical parameters of 541 patients gathered from 10 hospitals across Kerala, India. This study evaluated the performance of ML models, namely k-nearest neighbor, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine, and XGBoost, under varying imbalance ratios (IRs). Stratified resampling was used to generate multiple imbalanced scenarios. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score.
resultsFor IRs up to 3, RF outperformed other methods, based on performance measures. For IR >3, XGBoost emerged as the top-performing method, followed by DT. In the case of IR exceeding 5, the accuracy of the minority class fell below 50%. Based on simulation results, RF was used to identify significant variables.
conclusionFor original data (IR = 2.03), the RF model is a better model for predicting PCOS, with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 81%. This study contributes to making informed decisions on selecting the most appropriate classification method based on a specific proportion of imbalance in healthcare datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.