ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
3D intratumoral heterogeneity-based quantitative score from chest CT for preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is a critical adverse prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aimed to develop a stacking ensemble model that integrates three-dimensional intratumoral heterogeneity (3D ITH) scores with clinicoradiologic features to achieve accurate preoperative prediction of VPI in LUAD. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 1,301 patients with LUAD from three medical centers. Patients from Centers 1 and 2 were assigned to the development cohort, whereas those from Center 3 constituted the fixed external validation cohort. To calculate the 3D ITH score, we integrated local radiomic descriptors with global pixel distribution characteristics derived from whole tumor CT volumes. Clinicoradiologic features and 3D ITH scores were then used to construct six base machine learning models and a final stacking ensemble classifier. Model performance was primarily assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature contributions and to interpret the final model. Results: The stacking ensemble classifier achieved the highest AUC for preoperative prediction of VPI in LUAD (AUC = 0.878), whereas XGBoost showed competitive performance on several threshold dependent metrics. SHAP analysis identified the 3D ITH score as the most influential predictor, followed by nodule size and CT density. Comparative experiments further showed that the stacking ensemble model outperformed the conventional radiomics signature (AUC = 0.841) and the clinicoradiologic comparative model (AUC = 0.776). Conclusion: The model integrating 3D ITH scores with clinicoradiologic features showed strong discrimination for preoperative prediction of VPI in LUAD. This approach may serve as a useful adjunct for preoperative risk stratification and individualized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.