ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Stress during the first 1,000 days of life in humans, when everything begins.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain development from fetal life to early childhood occurs in highly sensitive periods, during which stress exposure-adaptive or toxic, prenatal or postnatal-can shape neural circuits involved in emotional regulation, particularly amygdala-centered networks. This review synthesizes current evidence on the biological mechanisms of early-life stress and protective interventions. It is based on a narrative review integrating original research, review articles, and international guidelines selected for relevance. Severe or prolonged early-life stress, including prenatal adversity, maternal anxiety, or environmental challenges, can disrupt body-brain interactions, alter hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, reduce vagal tone, and impair connectivity in the amygdala, hippocampus, and salience network. Epigenetic modifications in genes link early adversity to altered stress reactivity and emotional regulation. Functional MRI and physiological assessments indicate these changes are detectable before birth and during the first 1,000 days of life. Supportive caregiver interactions-through polyvagal-mediated synchrony, attachment, and social engagement-promote physiological regulation and healthy neural development. Interventions such as skin-to-skin contact reduce cortisol levels, enhance vagal activity, and increase oxytocin release. Traumatic early life stress can profoundly influence neural, hormonal, and epigenetic pathways, but positive caregiving and interventions can foster resilience and optimize neurodevelopment. These findings highlight the critical need to monitor and support stress regulation during the first 1,000 days of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.